How Independent Baseball Projections Works — At a Glance
- We project how many runs each team should score tonight — starting pitchers, lineups, ballpark, weather — and turn that into a win probability for each side. (The engine: a Dual-Poisson run model.)
- We check our numbers against thousands of past games and correct any bias, so when the model says “60%,” that side really wins about 60% of the time. (Technically: Platt calibration on a 7,359-game 2022–24 backtest, blended with 2026 live results as they accrue.)
- Then we compare our number to the sportsbook's price with the house's cut removed (the “no-vig” line, benchmarked to Pinnacle). Most nights they agree — no bet.
- When our probability beats the price by at least 4 points, we post the pick — with the odds, our number, the market's number, and a suggested stake.
- Every pick is logged before first pitch and never deleted. We also capture closing prices to test whether the market moves toward our picks (CLV) — the test we trust most, and one we won't claim victory on until validated data agrees.
Raw team strength, pitching, lineup, park, weather, and situational signals generate the baseline projection. Market information — specifically the book O/U total and Pinnacle no-vig probability — is used as a stabilizing input (via the book_total_constraint factor, α₁₆) to reduce extreme run-total outputs and align the model with the sharp betting market's run environment. After Platt calibration, the final Independent Baseball Projections probability is compared against the no-vig Pinnacle market probability to identify remaining pricing gaps where the model and market diverge.
Because the market is used as both a stabilizing input and a comparison benchmark, Independent Baseball Projections should be understood as a market-informed model rather than a fully market-independent projection. This is disclosed transparently; the model flags candidate pricing gaps in approximately 15–25% of games per day — whether those gaps are durable edge is what the live record is testing.
From Model to Pick — A Practical Example
Development-Period Backtest (Hypothetical) — 2022–2024 · Flat $100/Bet · 4pp+ Edge
Backtested
Ratio
Drawdown
Score
Honest Limitations — What This Model Does & Doesn't Do
- Backtests flatter themselves. The 2022–2024 numbers are hypothetical and were tuned over the same period they report. The live, timestamped record is the real test — judge the model there.
- The live sample is still small. A few months of forward picks can't yet confirm a durable edge; expect wide swings.
- CLV is still being validated. Closing-line value is the durability signal we trust most, but the live sample is thin and not yet conclusive — we'd rather show it honestly than over-claim.
- Market-informed, not independent. The model uses the sharp market as both a stabilizing input and a benchmark, so by design it won't diverge wildly from Pinnacle.
- Blind to late news. Once lineups post, the model doesn't react to scratches, first-pitch weather swings, or in-game information.
- A real edge still loses often. Even genuine value loses a large share of the time — only flat, disciplined, bankroll-aware staking survives the variance.